nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2021, 04, No.196 14-24
扎根理论视域下知识建构的动机结构与行为路径研究——面向深度学习的课堂教学结构化变革研究之八
基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金面上项目“网络学习空间中的学习风险预警模型和干预机制研究”(编号:62077012); 吉林省高等教育教学改革研究课题“面向深度学习的高等教育学生课堂参与边缘化诊断及干预研究”(编号:JG2020016); 吉林省社会科学基金项目(博士和青年扶持项目)“可视化技术支持在线自主学习的效能研究”(编号:2021C85)
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.13927/j.cnki.yuan.20210630.002
摘要:

知识建构实现从预设式到生成式教学的转变,让知识不再凝固,但容易受到学生主观因素的影响而出现学习效果差异。学生的主观态度跟自身学习动机关联,积极的学习动机激励知识建构,反之则阻碍学生学习。采用扎根理论方法对大学生进行半结构化访谈,并进行质性分析,归纳出知识建构动机分为自主动机和受控动机,并产生了探索、参与和迁移三个学习阶段,以及自学行为、合作行为和使用行为三种学习参与行为,进而演化为内部调节型和外部刺激型两种学习行为路径。研究成果揭示了知识建构动机的二元性及其行为的复杂性,提供了一种全面理解知识建构复杂行为的方法,扩展了知识建构动机行为的相关研究,并从认知神经科学与人工智能技术方面为知识建构实现深度学习提供新思路。

Abstract:

Knowledge construction realizes the transformation from prefabricated to generative teaching, so that knowledge is not solidified. But it is susceptible to the influence of students' subjective factors, leading to differences in learning effects. Students' subjective attitudes are related to their own learning motivations. Positive learning motivations encourage knowledge construction, and vice versa hinders students' learning. Based on grounded theory, conducting semi-structured interviews with the interviewees, qualitatively analyzing the interview data, and summarizing categories that affect students' participation in knowledge construction learning. Motivation can be summarized as autonomous motivation and controlled motivation. Driven by motivation, students have three learning stages of exploration, participation, and transfer, as well as three learning and participation behaviors: self-study behavior, cooperative behavior, and use behavior, and then evolved into internally regulated participation and external stimulus participation. The research results reveal the duality of knowledge construction motivation and the complexity of behavior, and provide a comprehensive understanding of the complex behavior of knowledge construction, and expand the relevant research on knowledge construction motivation. It provides new ideas for the development trend of knowledge construction for deep learning from two aspects of cognitive neuroscience and artificial intelligence technology.

参考文献

[1]钟启泉.深度学习:课堂转型的标识[J].全球教育展望,2021,50(01):14-33.

[2]药文静,姜强,李月,等.众包知识建构下学业情绪影响因素及唤醒机制的科学学研究——面向深度学习的课堂教学结构化变革研究之五[J].现代远距离教育,2020(5):33-42.

[3]姜强,药文静,晋欣泉,等.变革与新生:基于众包的自组织协同知识建构研究——面向深度学习的课堂教学结构化变革研究之一[J].现代远距离教育,2019(6):3-10.

[4]佐藤学.培育作为专家的教师:教师教育改革的宏观设计[M].东京:岩波书店,2015.

[5][美]R.基思·索耶.剑桥学习科学手册[M].徐晓东,译.北京:教育科学出版社,2010.

[6]殷常鸿,张义兵,王晴燕.运用知识建构圈促进学生课堂深度互动研究[J].中国电化教育,2020(2):102-108+125.

[7]李海峰,王炜.经验认知冲突探究法——一种翻转课堂模式下的深度协作知识建构学习策略探索[J].电化教育研究,2020,41(1):99-106+121.

[8]晋欣泉,姜强,赵蔚.基于众包的反思性学习模式设计与实践——面向深度学习的课堂教学结构化变革研究之三[J].现代远距离教育,2020(2):32-42.

[9]Manegre M,Plana G C.Foreign language learning through collaborative writing in knowledge building forums[J].Interactive Learning Environments,2020,28(7):1-13.

[10]Lin P Y,Hong H Y,Chai C S.Fostering college students’ design thinking in a knowledge-building environment[J].Educational Technology Research and Development,2020,68(1):949-974.

[11]张思,何晶铭,上超望,等.面向在线学习知识建构的认知投入分析模型及应用[J].远程教育杂志,2020,38(4):95-104.

[12]陈晓月.知识建构研究趋势与现状分析[J].创新创业理论研究与实践,2019,2(21):8-10.

[13]Hong H Y,Scardamalia M.Community knowledge assessment in a knowledge building environment[J].Computers & Education,2014,71(2):279-288.

[14]Orooji F,Taghiyareh F.Enhancing students’ knowledge building through utilising social interactions in an online learning environment[J].New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia,2018,24(4):307-334.

[15]胡金艳,蒋纪平,张义兵.知识建构理论能用在家庭非正式学习环境中吗?——基于儿童偶发性科学探究的个案追踪研究[J].学前教育研究,2020(5):67-79.

[16]韦怡彤,王继新,丁茹.混合式学习环境下深度学习导向的知识建构模式研究——以《教育技术学导论》课程为例[J].中国电化教育,2019(9):128-134.

[17]Bereiter C.Constructivism,socioculturalism,and popper’s world 3[J].Educational Researcher,1994,23(7):21-23.

[18]Scardamalia M.Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge[M].McLean:Open Court,2002.

[19]Chang B.Patterns of knowledge construction [J].Adult Education Quarterly,2018,68(2):108-136.

[20]Stahl G.Meaning and interpretation in collaboration[M].Netherlands:Kluwer Academic Publishers,2003.

[21]Stahl G.Group cognition in computer-assisted collaborative learning[J].Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,2010,21(2):79-90.

[22]Light D W,Berger P L,Luckmann T.The social construction of reality:A treatise in the sociology of knowledge[J].Sociological Analysis,1966,131(1):400-403.

[23]Deci E L,Ryan R M.Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior[M].Boston:Springer,1985.

[24]Black A L,Deci E L.The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry:A self‐determination theory perspective[J].Science Education ,2000,84(6):740-756.

[25]Hill,Andrew P.Motivation and university experience in first-year university students:A self-determination theory perspective[J].Journal of Hospitality,Leisure,Sport & Tourism Education ,2013,13:244-254.

[26]Rigby C S,Deci E L,Patrick B C,et al.Beyond the intrinsic-extrinsic dichotomy:Self-determination in motivation and learning[J].Motivation and Emotion,1992,16(3):165-185.

[27]Schunk D H,Pintrich P R,Meece J L.Motivation in education:Theory,research,and applications[M].Upper Saddle River:Prentice Hall Merrill,1995.

[28]Gagné M,Forest J,Vansteenkiste M,et al.The multidimensional work motivation scale:Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries[J].European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology,2015,24(2):178-196.

[29]胡小清,唐炎,黄霞,等.基于自我决定动机理论视角下的体育学习效果研究进展[J].体育科学,2020,40(4):67-77.

[30]Deci E L,Ryan R M.Self-determination theory:A macrotheory of human motivation,development,and health[J].Canadian Psychology,2008,49(3):182-185.

[31]Deci E L,Vallerand,et al.Motivation and education:The self-determination perspective.[J].Educational Psychologist,1991,26(3):325-346.

[32]Vansteenkiste M,Simons J,Lens W,et al.Motivating learning,performance,and persistence:The synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts.[J].Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,2004,87(2):246-260.

[33]梁芮铭,姜强,晋欣泉,等.众包知识建构下STEM学习动机影响机制与强化路径——面向深度学习的课堂教学结构化变革研究之六[J].现代远距离教育,2020(5):43-51.

[34]杨冉冉,龙如银.基于扎根理论的城市居民绿色出行行为影响因素理论模型探讨[J].武汉大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2014,67(5):13-18.

[35]薛增灿,张义兵.国际视域下的知识建构研究:现状与新趋势[J].数字教育,2020,6(3):9-15.

[36]赵琳琳.大学英语学习策略与学习效果关系:学习动机的调节效应[J].现代远距离教育,2021(02):26-34.

[37]王国华.技术提升少数民族大学生国家通用语学习动机的研究——以藏族大学生为例[J].现代远距离教育,2020(06):50-59.

[38]张俊列,韦利仿.深度学习的脑科学基础与课堂教学策略[J].教育理论与实践,2020,40(28):59-64.

[39]王允庆.脑科学对教育的启示[J].中小学管理,2014(06):14-16.

[40]Nicholls J G,Patashnick M,Nolen S B.Adolescents’ theories of education[J].Journal of Educational Psychology,1985,77(6):683-692.

[41]Lee J,Park J.An Exploratory Study on Brain-based Instructional Design Strategies[J].Journal of Educational Technology,2014,30(3):335-359.

[42]国务院印发《新一代人工智能发展规划》[EB/OL].[2020-07-20].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2017-07/20/content_5211996.htm.

[43]叶浩生,国礼羽,麻彦坤.生成与动力:具身认知研究中的互动观[J].心理学探新,2020,40(06):483-488.

[44]佐藤学.学校的挑战:创建学习共同体[M].钟启泉,译.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2010.

基本信息:

DOI:10.13927/j.cnki.yuan.20210630.002

中图分类号:G424

引用信息:

[1]姜强,梁芮铭,赵蔚,等.扎根理论视域下知识建构的动机结构与行为路径研究——面向深度学习的课堂教学结构化变革研究之八[J].现代远距离教育,2021,No.196(04):14-24.DOI:10.13927/j.cnki.yuan.20210630.002.

基金信息:

国家自然科学基金面上项目“网络学习空间中的学习风险预警模型和干预机制研究”(编号:62077012); 吉林省高等教育教学改革研究课题“面向深度学习的高等教育学生课堂参与边缘化诊断及干预研究”(编号:JG2020016); 吉林省社会科学基金项目(博士和青年扶持项目)“可视化技术支持在线自主学习的效能研究”(编号:2021C85)

发布时间:

2021-07-05

出版时间:

2021-07-05

网络发布时间:

2021-07-05

检 索 高级检索