| 782 | 0 | 118 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
教师隐性知识显性化是将内隐实践经验转化为可传播、可迭代显性知识的过程,但传统基于个体反思与同伴交流的方式,受限于对话空间与认知支持的不足,难以有效促进这一转化。生成式人工智能(GAI)与教师专业发展的融合为突破上述局限提供了新途径。为探讨GAI赋能教师知识转化的实现路径,采用多案例研究法,以26个人机协同的课例研修活动为分析对象,揭示其过程特征与典型表现:在经验显现协同阶段,GAI通过人机对话激活教师内隐教学观念、习惯与技巧的语言化表征;在经验加工协同阶段,零散经验信息经由GAI支持的概念识别、逻辑迁移与结构组织转化为结构化教学认知;在知识外化协同阶段,GAI促进教师经验结构实体化为教学内容、教学方法与技术整合方式等人机共创的显性知识成果。基于此,构建了GAI赋能教师隐性知识显性化的协同进阶模型,为人机协同视域下的教师知识发展研究提供参考。
Abstract:The explicitation of teachers’ tacit knowledge refers to the process of transforming implicit practical experience into communicable and iterative explicit knowledge. However, traditional approaches based on individual reflection and peer interaction are often constrained by limited dialogic space and insufficient cognitive support, making it difficult to effectively facilitate this transformation. The integration of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) into teacher professional development provides a new pathway for addressing these limitations. To explore how GAI supports teachers’ knowledge transformation, a multiple-case study was conducted with 26 human–AI collaborative lesson study activities as the analytical cases, revealing the process characteristics and typical manifestations of GAI-enabled tacit knowledge explicitation. At the stage of experiential articulation, GAI activates the linguistic representation of teachers’ implicit instructional beliefs, habitual practices, and pedagogical skills through human–AI dialogue. At the stage of experiential processing, fragmented experiential information is transformed into structured pedagogical cognition through GAI-supported concept identification, logical transfer, and structural organization. At the stage of knowledge externalization, GAI facilitates the embodiment of teachers’ experiential structures into human–AI co-created explicit knowledge products, including instructional content, teaching methods, and technology integration approaches. Based on these findings, a progressive collaborative model of GAI-enabled explicitation of teachers’ tacit knowledge is constructed, providing a reference for research on teacher knowledge development from a human–AI collaboration perspective.
[1] 魏晓宇,苏娜. 中小学教师知识共享:价值、困境与进路[J]. 教师教育研究, 2024(5): 108–113.
[2] 张铭凯,王瑞雪. 智能时代的教师知识共享:价值解析、阻滞剖析与进路探析[J]. 电化教育研究, 2024(5): 13–19.
[3] 李森,杨征铭.教师隐性知识管理的主要障碍与调控策略[J].中国教育学刊, 2021(1): 98–102.
[4] 魏宏聚,辛晓玲.教学经验概念化的理论阐释与实践探索[J].教育发展研究, 2023(22): 66–74.
[5] Li T, Ji Y, Zhan Z. Expert or machine? Comparing the effect of pairing student teacher with in-service teacher and ChatGPT on their critical thinking, learning performance, and cognitive load in an integrated-STEM course[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 2024: 1–16.
[6] 詹泽慧, 杨明欢, 张伟春,等. GAI赋能教师队伍建设的“裂变—聚合”双机制模型[J].现代远程教育研究, 2025(4): 60–68+79.
[7] 陈港,孙元涛. 知识“可供性”:人机协同知识生产如何“双智驱动”[J]. 电化教育研究, 2025(11): 25–32.
[8] 钟启泉. 从SECI理论看教师专业发展的特质[J]. 全球教育展望, 2008(2): 7–13, 23.
[9] Polanyi M. The Study of Man[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,1963.
[10] Nonaka I, Umemoto K, Senoo D. From information processing to knowledge creation: A paradigm shift in business management[J]. Technology in society, 1996(2): 203-218.
[11] 陈列.教师隐性知识管理:促进教师专业发展的重要手段[J].当代教育科学, 2009(9): 33–36.
[12] 辛晓玲.教学经验的知识属性及其表征与转化——基于波兰尼的个人知识理论[J].教育理论与实践,2023(28):53-57.
[13] 张志泉,陈振华.论教师的知识转化力[J].中国教育学刊, 2023(3): 79–84.
[14] 谭友坤.隐性知识显性化:缄默知识观视域下新入职教师的实践智慧习得[J].中国成人教育, 2016(2): 142–144.
[15] 辛晓玲.教学经验概念化的教师专业发展意蕴及路径选择[J]. 当代教育科学, 2023(7): 19–26.
[16] 梁友明,王陆.教师为何不说话:循证教研集体沉默现象的发生及消解机制研究[J]. 上海教育科研, 2024(8): 56–61.
[17] 詹泽慧,季瑜,牛世婧,等. ChatGPT嵌入教育生态的内在机理、表征形态及风险化解[J].现代远距离教育, 2023(4):3-13.
[18] Wei X, Wang L, Koszalka T A, et al. Enhancing pre-service teachers’ reflective thinking skills through generative AI-assisted digital storytelling creation: A three-dimensional framework analysis[J]. Computers & Education, 2025, 235: 105356.
[19] 冯晓英,徐辛,张汇坷.人工智能赋能教学设计新范式[J].开放教育研究, 2025(3): 63–73.
[20] 史逄玉,王新宇,柏宏权. 从“屏上学”到“事上见”的学用差距何以缩减——基于教师数字化学习典型实践的多案例分析[J].中国电化教育, 2024(9): 95–101.
[21] 陈灵华, 张瑞. 知识转化视域下教师教学经验发展的样态、逻辑及路径[J].教学与管理, 2025(15): 14–19.
[22] Salda?a J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers(3rd ed.)[M].London: SAGE Publications, 2016.
[23] 王彦明. 教学创新再探寻——基于教学习惯的视角[J].教育科学研究, 2022(2): 67–71, 96.
[24] Hamilton E R, Rosenberg J M, Akcaoglu M. The substitution augmentation modification redefinition (SAMR) model: A critical review and suggestions for its use[J]. TechTrends, 2016, 60(5): 433-441.
[25] 魏戈,陈向明.主体性的浮现:教师实践性知识的教育性意义[J].教育学报, 2019(4):72-79.
[26] 王冬青,陈自力,邵文豪,等. 从“负能”到“赋能”:基于LLMs的思维链提示设计与教研AI智能体构建——以课堂教学智能分析为例[J]. 中国电化教育, 2025(3): 111–117+125.
[27] 王兆雪, 武法提, 郭子涵,等. 创造性思维的跃迁:基于生成式人工智能的多智能体协同系统构建与应用[J]. 中国电化教育, 2025(12): 1–10, 40.
[28] Von Krogh G. How does social software change knowledge management? Toward a strategic research agenda[J]. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2012(2): 154–164.
基本信息:
DOI:10.13927/j.cnki.yuan.20260430.003
中图分类号:TP18;G451
引用信息:
[1]詹泽慧,吕思源,张广维,等.从“默会”到“共创”:GAI赋能教师隐性知识显性化的多案例研究[J].现代远距离教育().DOI:10.13927/j.cnki.yuan.20260430.003.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金面上项目“基于事理图谱的计算思维智能导训模型及可解释性研究”(编号:62277018); 广东省哲学社会科学创新工程第三批特别委托重大项目“广东省拔尖创新人才的科学选拔、动态培养与输送衔接机制研究”(编号:GD25WTCXGC10)
2026-04-30
2026-04-30
2026-04-30