| 993 | 1 | 41 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
计算思维是现代人类必备的核心素养之一,高质量的同伴学习对学习绩效的提升具有重要意义,有效的同伴学习投入对于计算思维发展具有重要支持作用。对多类型、多样态同伴学习投入进行精准画像,探讨其对计算思维发展的影响机理并进行智能干预,具有理论意义与现实价值。研究提出了同伴学习投入和计算思维发展的关联关系分析与量化计算模型,其指向发现同伴学习行为、情感、认知与计算思维发展的关联机制并突破隐含变量发现与参数求解的难题;构建了面向计算思维发展的同伴学习投入精准画像模型,为实现同伴学习投入的计算和整合提供表征基础;基于关联机制的回归分析与同伴学习投入精准画像,提出了基于强化学习的面向计算思维发展的同伴学习投入智能干预模型。
Abstract:Computational thinking is one of the core competencies that modern humans must possess, high quality peer learning is of great significance for improving learning performance, and effective peer learning engagement plays an important supportive role in the development of computational thinking. Accurately profiling the various types and forms of peer learning engagement, exploring their impact mechanisms on the development of computational thinking, and implementing intelligent interventions have theoretical significance and practical value. This research proposes a correlation analysis and representation model between peer learning engagement and computational thinking, aiming to explore the correlation mechanism between behavioral emotional, cognitive peer learning engagement and computational thinking development, including the discovery of hidden variables and parameter solving. This research also constructs a precise profiling model of peer learning engagement for the development of computational thinking, which is expected to provide a presentation basis for the calculation and integration of peer learning engagement. Based on the regression analysis of association mechanism and the accurate profiling of peer learning engagement, this research proposes an intelligent intervention model of peer learning engagement for the development of computational thinking.
[1]Wilson K G.Grand challenges to computational science[J].Future Generation Computer Systems.1988(2-3):171-189.
[2]陈国良.大学计算机——计算思维视角(第2版)[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2014.
[3]吴磊,白青贺,范丽鹏.共生理论视域下在线协作学习机制与互动模式分析[J].现代远距离教育,2024(4):60-70.
[4]刘敏,汪琼.结对编程:中小学编程教育的首选教学组织形式[J].现代教育技术,2022(3):102-109.
[5]谭金波,吴思思,吴磊,等.基于行为序列的“专家—新手”结对编程话语互动模式分析[J].电化教育研究,2022(7):106-113.
[6]张银荣,黄昌勤,韩中美,等.协作编程有助于培养学生的计算思维吗?——基于32项实验或准实验研究的元分析[J].现代教育技术,2023(8):77-86.
[7]Zakaria Z,Vandenberg J,Tsan J,et al.Two-computer pair programming:Exploring a feedback intervention to improve collaborative talk in elementary students[J].Computer Science Education,2022(2):3-29.
[8]白然.cMOOC学习收获及其与学习投入关系的研究[J].现代远距离教育,2020(4):63-72.
[9]张屹,林裕如,周平红,等.基于社会认知网络分析的学习者协作问题解决能力发展研究[J].现代远距离教育,2024(2):42-52.
[10]Johnson D W,Johnson R T,Holubec E J.Circles of learning:Cooperation in the classroom (3rd ed.)[M].Edina,MN:Interaction Book Company,1990.
[11]李新,李艳燕.协作学习情境中学习投入数字化表征模型的构建与应用[J].中国远程教育,2022(8):70-77.
[12]张思,何晶铭,上超望,等.面向在线学习协同知识建构的认知投入分析模型及应用[J].远程教育杂志,2020(4):95-104.
[13]吴林静,高喻,涂凤娇,等.基于语义的在线协作会话学习投入自动分析模型及应用研究[J].电化教育研究,2022(3):77-84.
[14]张露,胡若楠,雷悦,等.基于人工智能表情识别与差异分析的游戏化学习投入状态研究[J].现代教育技术,2023(12):89-99.
[15]吴军其,吴飞燕,张萌萌,等.多模态视域下智慧课堂协作学习投入度分析模型构建及应用[J].电化教育研究,2022(7):73-80+88.
[16]Israel-Fishelson R,Hershkovitz A,Eguíluz A,et al.A log-based analysis of the associations between creativity and computational thinking[J].Journal of Educational Computing Research,2021(5):926-959.
[17]Lai X,Wong G K.Collaborative versus individual problem solving in computational thinking through programming:A meta-analysis[J].British Journal of Educational Technology,2022(1):150-170.
[18]周琴,邓玉.技术支持型教学干预对学生计算思维培养的影响——基于37篇国际实证研究的元分析[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2023(6):44-56.
基本信息:
DOI:10.13927/j.cnki.yuan.20250403.001
中图分类号:TP3-4;G434
引用信息:
[1]郑燕林,曹帅,任维武.面向计算思维发展的同伴学习投入精准画像与智能干预设计[J].现代远距离教育,2025,No.219(03):54-62.DOI:10.13927/j.cnki.yuan.20250403.001.
基金信息:
吉林省科技厅重点科技研发项目“基于认知智能的教师数字化教学胜任力精准画像关键技术研究和应用”(编号:20240302082GX)